On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in the cases Loper Bright Enterprises, et al. v. Raimondo, et al. and Relentless Inc. et al. v. Department of Commerce, et ...
While textualists want to only focus on the actual text of the statute, the purpose of statutory interpretation, in my ...
In the 1984 Chevron case, the Supreme Court held that where a statute was ambiguous, courts must follow the statutory interpretation of the agency administering the statute, so long as the ...
The US Supreme Court on Friday struck down a 40-year-old precedent known as the ‘Chevron doctrine’ that empowered agencies to interpret ambiguous laws. The decision could lead to future challenges to ...
In 2015, Justice Elena Kagan gave the late Justice Antonin Scalia credit for ushering in a new method of statutory interpretation that emphasized the central importance of a statute's text. Indeed, it ...
A PDF version of this document with embedded text is available at the link below: (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is ...
U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order stating that only the president and attorney general can interpret the law. A Trump official just announced that Trump has signed an executive ...
For 40 years, Chevron, U.S.A., v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), required federal courts to defer to an administrative agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback